Joey Umadac and Claire Bingayen was in fact arranged to help you within Sta

RONULO Compared to. Someone

FACTS: Rosa Catholic Parish Chapel out of San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte. Although not, at the time of wedding, new supposed officiating priest, Fr. Mario Ragaza, would not solemnize the marriage abreast of training that partners unsuccessful to help you safe a married relationship permit. As a great recourse, Joey, who was simply up coming putting on barong tagalong, and you will Claire, clad into the a married relationship clothes, along with their parents, sponsors and you can tourist, proceeded on Independent Church regarding Filipino Christians, labeled as the Aglipayan Chapel. It requested the petitioner, an Aglipayan priest, to do a ceremony that the second consented despite having come told by couples that they had zero relationship certificate.

The fresh new petitioner prepared his choir and planned a bulk on the couples on the same big date. The guy held the fresh service on visibility of your own groom, this new bride-to-be, the moms and dads, the primary and supplementary sponsors and rest of the invited customers.

The new prosecution’s witnesses, Joseph and Mary Anne Yere, affirmed towards occurrences of your ceremony. Joseph try the brand new veil recruit while Mary Anne are brand new wire mentor in the wedding. Mary Anne affirmed one she watched the new fiance walk-down new aisle. She as well as watched the couple exchange the wedding rings, hug one another, and you can indication a file. She read new petitioner instructing the main sponsors in order to sign the new matrimony offer. Thereafter, it visited the new lobby, got dinner and got photo. She noticed the new petitioner truth be told there.

Florida Umadac, the mother of Joey, affirmed that she heard the couple state within the service that they grab both since the husband and wife. Days pursuing the wedding, she went along to the fresh civil local civil registrar away from San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte which have Atty. Mariano R. Nalupta Jr. where she obtained a certification you to definitely zero marriage licenses are awarded towards the partners.

The fresh petitioner, whenever you are admitting that he presented a ceremony, declined one to his work from true blessing the happy couple are tantamount so you can an effective solemnization of one’s matrimony as the considered by law.

ISSUE: Claimed the latest petitioner is guilty of violating Post 352 of one’s Revised Penal Code (RPC) to own allegedly creating an illegal wedding ceremony.

She together with understood the marriage invite supplied to her by the Joey

RATIO: Petitioner conducted an unlawful marriage service. The newest crime since the delivered to into the Ways 352 of the RPC is the show regarding ily Password and therefore checks out:

(3) A wedding ceremony which will take lay for the appearance of brand new hiring parties before solemnizing manager in addition to their personal report one to it get each other as wife and husband from the exposure away from for around a couple witnesses of legal years.

Artwork. six. Zero given form or spiritual rite with the solemnization of your relationships will become necessary. It would be called for, but not, towards contracting functions to appear truly until the solemnizing manager and you will state regarding visibility away from not less than one or two witnesses from court decades that they simply take one another because the partner and you may girlfriend. This statement would be included in the relationship certificate and this should become finalized of the hiring people as well as their witnesses and you can attested of the solemnizing administrator.

The fresh new Finest Courtroom said one exactly what generated the petitioner’s operate an excellent wedding and not soleley only true blessing are you to definitely whenever you are there is absolutely no given mode or spiritual rite, all that is needed was “on the contracting parties to appear directly up until the solemnizing officer and you will state on the visibility away from not less than a few witnesses out of court age that they bring both because the partner and you will girlfriend.”

From what first specifications, the petitioner accepted that people searched before your which facts are affirmed in order to from the witnesses. To the second needs, we discover you to, contrary to the petitioner’s allegation, the latest prosecution has proven, from the testimony from witnesses, your employing functions privately proclaimed which they grab each other since the couple. Thus, it’s obvious you to definitely petitioner presented a wedding service and not a mere blessing.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked